Glass Health vs Suki — 2026 Comparison

Glass Health combines ambient scribing with real-time clinical insights — including differential diagnosis, suggested history questions, and potential next steps — plus assessment and plan generation grounded in clinical guidelines and clinical Q&A. All starting free. Suki is a documentation-and-coding platform with broad EHR integrations that is expanding into clinical intelligence via UpToDate and chart-based insights. Glass Health Pro ($90/month) includes native CDS — synthesized DDx, guideline-grounded A&P, and evidence-cited Q&A — capabilities beyond what Suki’s estimated $299-$399/month currently offers.

Suki started as a voice-command assistant for physicians, evolved into an ambient scribe, and now bills itself as a documentation-and-coding platform with integrations across 8+ named EHR systems, ICD-10/HCC coding, ambient order staging, and expanding clinical intelligence features including UpToDate integration and chart-based insights. Glass Health went in a different direction entirely: ambient scribing combined with native clinical decision support — real-time clinical insights during encounters (chief complaint identification, differential diagnosis support, suggested history questions, and potential next steps), guideline-grounded A&P generation with evidence citations, and clinical Q&A with citations to clinical guidelines and medical literature. Suki’s foundation is revenue cycle optimization. Glass Health’s foundation is clinical reasoning.

Key Takeaways

Suki is a documentation and coding platform with broad EHR integrations (Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, MEDITECH), ambient order staging, ICD-10/HCC coding, and expanding clinical intelligence features including UpToDate integration and AI-generated A&P content. It does not generate structured differential diagnoses or guideline-grounded assessment and plans with evidence citations.
Glass Health is the only platform that combines ambient scribing with native clinical decision support — including real-time clinical insights during encounters (differential diagnosis, suggested history questions, and next steps), three-tier differential diagnosis, A&P generation, and clinical Q&A with citations to clinical guidelines and medical literature.
Suki’s estimated pricing ranges from $299-$399 per provider per month (not publicly listed). Glass Health starts free with its Lite tier and offers full CDS at every plan.
Both platforms are HIPAA-compliant. Glass Health integrates with Epic, eClinicalWorks, and Athena. Suki integrates with Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, MEDITECH, eClinicalWorks, Elation, and more.

How Does Glass Health Compare to Suki on Features?

The fundamental difference between Glass Health and Suki is product scope. Suki is primarily an AI documentation and coding platform — it captures conversations, generates structured notes, stages orders, suggests billing codes, and is expanding into clinical intelligence via UpToDate integration, chart summaries, and AI-generated A&P content derived from conversation and EHR context. Glass Health is an AI clinical platform — it captures conversations, provides real-time clinical insights during the encounter, generates structured differential diagnoses, drafts guideline-grounded assessment and plans with evidence citations, answers clinical questions with citations to clinical guidelines and medical literature, and produces documentation across six formats.

The U.S. AI medical scribing market was valued at $397 million in 2024 and is projected to grow at a 25.09% CAGR through 2033 (Grand View Research, 2024). Within this market, Suki has carved out a strong position in documentation plus revenue cycle, while Glass Health is pioneering the combined scribe-plus-CDS category.

Feature	Glass Health	Suki
Ambient scribing	Yes — real-time listening with live clinical insights	Yes — ambient documentation across 100+ specialties
Real-time clinical insights	Yes — real-time clinical insights including differential diagnosis, suggested history questions, and next steps	No
Structured differential diagnosis	Yes — three-tier DDx: Most Likely, Expanded, Can’t Miss	No
Assessment & plan generation	Yes — problem-based A&P with evidence citations grounded in clinical guidelines	Yes — AI-generated from conversation and EHR context using problem-based charting
Clinical Q&A	Yes — search of clinical guidelines and medical literature with in-text citations	Yes — patient chart queries and medical literature via Google Cloud and UpToDate integration
Documentation types	6 types: H&P, Progress Note, Clinic Note, Discharge Summary, Discharge Instructions, Patient Handout	Structured clinical notes, patient instructions
Custom templates	Yes — DDx, A&P, and documentation templates customizable to your style	Problem-based charting templates
Longitudinal patient encounters	Yes — patient context persists across encounters	Pre-visit summaries from EHR data
Deep Reasoning mode	Yes — maximum analytical depth for complex multi-system cases	No
Encounter timeline & summary	Yes — AI-generated encounter summary with chronological timeline	No
ICD-10/HCC/CPT coding	No	Yes — automated ICD-10, HCC, CPT, and E/M coding
Order staging	No	Yes — ambient prescription order staging (industry first)
Voice commands	No — ambient-first by design	Yes — voice dictation and commands alongside ambient mode
EHR integration	Epic, eClinicalWorks, Athena	Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, MEDITECH, eCW, Elation, MEDENT, Azalea
Language support	English	80+ languages
HIPAA compliance	Yes — BAA, encryption	Yes — BAA, SOC 2 Type II, AES-256 encryption
Pricing model	Free tier + paid plans ($20-$200/month)	~$299-$399/month per provider (estimated, not public)

What Can Suki Do Well?

Suki has evolved from a voice-command dictation tool into a broad documentation and coding platform that is expanding into clinical intelligence.

Suki’s core strengths include:

Broad EHR integration: Suki offers deep bidirectional integrations with Epic (including Suki INSIDE embedded in Haiku/Hyperdrive), Oracle Health (Cerner), athenahealth (named Preferred Solution Partner in January 2026), and MEDITECH Expanse (first ambient AI integrated with MEDITECH documentation APIs) (Suki EHR). This breadth covers more EHR ecosystems than most ambient scribes.
Ambient order staging: Suki is the first ambient scribe to generate and stage prescription orders directly from spoken conversation — a meaningful revenue cycle feature that moves beyond documentation.
ICD-10, HCC, CPT, and E/M coding: Suki suggests billing codes from encounter content, with health systems reporting significant reductions in amended encounters from improved coding accuracy.
Pre-visit patient summaries: One of Suki’s most-adopted features — pulling prior visits, medications, labs, and problems from the EHR to prepare clinicians before encounters.
100+ specialty support: Suki covers outpatient, inpatient, emergency department, and telehealth settings across 100+ specialties.
80+ language support: Suki supports 80+ languages for multilingual documentation, a significant advantage for diverse patient populations.
Voice command flexibility: While Suki has added ambient capture, it retains a voice-command interface that gives clinicians direct control over note editing, chart queries, and order management — useful for clinicians who prefer explicit interaction.
Growing enterprise traction: Suki is used at a range of healthcare organizations.

What Can’t Suki Do That Glass Health Can?

Suki has built an impressive platform for the operational side of medicine — documentation, ICD-10/HCC coding, ambient order staging, and broad EHR connectivity — and is expanding into clinical intelligence with UpToDate integration, pre-visit summaries, and AI-generated A&P content from conversation and EHR data. These are meaningful capabilities. Where the distinction emerges is in how each platform approaches clinical reasoning. Suki’s UpToDate partnership (announced March 2025) surfaces reference content alongside notes, and its A&P generation is grounded in conversation and EHR context. Glass Health takes a different approach: synthesizing evidence from clinical guidelines into a ranked differential, a structured treatment plan with citations, and real-time diagnostic reasoning during the encounter.

Glass Health occupies the synthesized clinical reasoning space where its approach differs most from Suki’s:

Diagnostic analysis running in parallel with the conversation: Suki listens to encounters to generate notes, billing codes, and staged orders. Glass Health listens to the same conversation for a different purpose — constructing a differential diagnosis in real time, identifying chief complaints, highlighting gaps in the history, and recommending next steps while the patient is still present. Suki’s ambient intelligence is optimized for revenue capture; Glass Health’s is optimized for clinical accuracy.
Tiered differential diagnosis that no Suki plan includes: Glass Health structures its DDx into three actionable categories: Most Likely Diagnoses with immediate testing recommendations, an Expanded Differential for cases where the primary workup is unrevealing, and Can’t Miss Diagnoses flagging high-morbidity conditions that warrant early rule-out. Each tier includes specific diagnostic steps. Suki generates ICD-10 codes, HCC risk scores, and AI-driven A&P content from encounter and EHR data — but it does not produce a structured differential diagnosis or suggest diagnoses the clinician has not already stated.
A&P output grounded in clinical guidelines with evidence citations: Both platforms generate A&P content, but they differ in methodology. Suki generates AI-driven A&P content using its LLM Manager and problem-based charting, grounded in conversation and EHR context. Glass Health generates an independent, evidence-cited assessment and plan grounded in clinical guidelines: an overall assessment paragraph, problem-by-problem analyses, diagnostic workup bullets, treatment recommendations, and chronic problem documentation with inline citations. The distinction is sourcing — Suki’s A&P reflects what was discussed and what exists in the chart; Glass Health’s A&P can surface guideline-recommended interventions or flag overlooked comorbidities that may not have come up in conversation.
Evidence synthesis versus reference-based Q&A: Both platforms offer clinical Q&A. Suki provides patient chart queries and medical literature access via Google Cloud and its UpToDate integration — enabling clinicians to ask questions about their patients and access reference content. Glass Health’s clinical Q&A searches clinical guidelines and the broader medical literature, then returns a synthesized answer with inline citations and a reference list. The distinction is output format: Suki surfaces reference content and chart data for the clinician to interpret; Glass Health synthesizes that information into a structured, cited answer.
A patient record system that carries context forward: Glass Health’s Patient and Encounter system accepts uploaded outside records, prior notes, labs, imaging, and specialist consult reports — all persisting across encounters and directly shaping future clinical output. Suki pulls pre-visit summaries from the connected EHR, which is helpful for preparation but bounded by what the EHR contains. External records, outside imaging, and documents from non-integrated systems do not flow into Suki’s context.
Deeper processing when the diagnosis is not straightforward: Glass Health’s Deep Reasoning mode engages maximum analytical depth for multi-system presentations, atypical cases, and teaching scenarios — producing measurably higher accuracy on clinical benchmarks. Glass Health offers an explicit Deep Reasoning mode for complex cases; Suki does not advertise an equivalent feature.

Suki is an excellent choice for practices where documentation speed, coding accuracy, and order automation are the primary goals, and its expanding clinical intelligence features (UpToDate integration, chart Q&A, AI-generated A&P) add meaningful value. Glass Health takes the reasoning layer further — constructing differential diagnoses, grounding assessment and plans in clinical guidelines with citations, and synthesizing evidence into structured clinical answers, all within the same platform where scribing already happens.

How Does Pricing Compare Between Glass Health and Suki?

Suki pricing:

Suki does not publicly list pricing. Third-party estimates place costs at approximately (Healos, 2025):

Tier	Estimated Monthly Cost	Includes
Suki Compose	~$299/provider/month	Core documentation and dictation, standard SOAP notes, basic EHR integration
Suki Assistant	~$399/provider/month	Full ambient documentation, deep EHR integration, voice commands, order staging
Enterprise	Custom pricing	Custom integrations, governance, SSO, dedicated support

Volume discounts available. Sales-driven model — requires discovery calls and negotiation.

Glass Health pricing:

Plan	Monthly Price	Annual Price	Includes
Lite	Free ($0)	Free ($0)	Limited clinical decision support and ambient scribing
Starter	$20/month	$18/month	Extended CDS and ambient scribing
Pro	$90/month	$81/month	Unlimited ambient scribing, CDS, and more
Max	$200/month	$180/month	Everything in Pro + EHR integration (Epic, eClinicalWorks, Athena)

The pricing comparison: Suki’s estimated cost of $299-$399/month per provider delivers documentation, coding, and order staging. Glass Health’s Pro plan at $90/month includes unlimited ambient scribing plus the full clinical decision support platform — real-time clinical insights (including differential diagnosis, suggested history questions, and potential next steps), three-tier differential diagnosis, assessment and plan generation, clinical Q&A with citations to clinical guidelines and medical literature, Deep Reasoning, patient context persistence, and six documentation types. Glass Health’s free Lite tier lets clinicians evaluate both ambient scribing and CDS before committing — no sales cycle required.

Try Glass Health free — no sales calls needed →

When Should You Choose Suki Over Glass Health?

If you don’t need clinical decision support, differential diagnosis, or treatment plan drafts, and your primary need is broad EHR compatibility across many systems, Suki handles that. Suki is the better choice in specific scenarios:

You need broad EHR integration: Suki integrates deeply with Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, and MEDITECH — covering more EHR ecosystems than Glass Health.
Revenue cycle optimization is a top priority: Suki’s ICD-10, HCC, CPT, and E/M coding plus ambient order staging directly support billing accuracy and revenue capture.
You prefer voice-command control: Suki’s voice interface lets clinicians dictate, edit, and query directly — useful for clinicians who want explicit control over documentation.
You need 80+ language support: Suki supports 80+ languages for multilingual documentation. Glass Health currently supports English.
You run MEDITECH Expanse: Suki is the first ambient AI integrated with MEDITECH Expanse documentation APIs. Glass Health does not currently support MEDITECH.

Suki’s broad EHR integrations (including Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, MEDITECH, Elation, MEDENT, Azalea, and others via its SDK partner program), built-in coding, and voice-command flexibility set it apart for practices that prioritize broad compatibility.

When Should You Choose Glass Health Over Suki?

Glass Health is the better choice when your workflow demands go beyond documentation and coding:

You need clinical decision support during encounters: Glass Health provides real-time clinical insights — including differential diagnosis, suggested history questions, and potential next steps — that refine as you gather information. Suki does not offer this capability at any tier.
You want assessment and plan drafting grounded in clinical guidelines with evidence citations: Both platforms generate A&P content, but Glass Health’s A&P is grounded in clinical guidelines with inline citations — not solely derived from conversation and chart context.
You want synthesized clinical Q&A with citations to clinical guidelines and medical literature: Both platforms offer clinical Q&A. Glass Health’s clinical chat searches clinical guidelines and the broader medical literature to synthesize answers with inline citations. Suki offers chart Q&A and medical literature access via UpToDate — Glass Health’s distinction is synthesized, cited reasoning rather than reference-based answers.
You want accessible pricing without a sales process: Glass Health’s free Lite tier lets you start today. Suki requires sales calls and contract negotiation.
You use Epic, eClinicalWorks, or Athena: Glass Health offers live EHR integrations with full CDS for these ambulatory EHRs.
You want patient context that persists across visits: Glass Health’s Patient and Encounter system maintains a longitudinal record that informs clinical reasoning over time.
You want to avoid tool stacking: Glass Health consolidates scribing, CDS, and clinical reference into one platform, reducing the need for separate subscriptions.
You want to start free: Glass Health’s Lite tier includes both ambient scribing and clinical decision support at no cost.
You’re exploring other options: See how Glass Health compares to simpler, lower-cost scribes like Freed or enterprise-focused platforms like DAX Copilot.

Start with the Glass Health free tier →

FAQ

Does Suki offer clinical decision support?

Suki is primarily a documentation and coding platform that is expanding into clinical intelligence. It partnered with Wolters Kluwer in March 2025 to surface UpToDate reference content, offers AI-generated A&P content derived from conversation and EHR context, provides chart Q&A, and generates pre-visit summaries. These are meaningful clinical intelligence features. However, Suki does not generate structured differential diagnoses or guideline-grounded assessment and plans with evidence citations. Glass Health includes native DDx, guideline-grounded A&P generation with citations, Deep Reasoning, and synthesized clinical Q&A as built-in features at every tier including the free Lite plan.

How much does Suki cost compared to Glass Health?

Suki does not publicly list pricing. Third-party estimates place Suki Compose at ~$299/month and Suki Assistant at ~$399/month per provider. Glass Health’s Lite tier is free and includes both ambient scribing and clinical decision support. Glass Health’s Pro plan at $90/month includes unlimited scribing plus the full CDS platform.

Which platform has better EHR integrations?

Suki integrates with more EHR systems — Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, MEDITECH, eClinicalWorks, Elation, MEDENT, and Azalea Health. Glass Health integrates with Epic, eClinicalWorks, and Athena. If you use Epic, Oracle Health, or MEDITECH, Suki has the integration advantage. If you use eCW or Athena and want CDS alongside scribing, Glass Health delivers more clinical value.

Can Suki generate a differential diagnosis?

Suki generates AI-driven A&P content and offers clinical intelligence features (UpToDate integration, chart Q&A, pre-visit summaries), but it does not produce structured differential diagnoses. Glass Health generates structured three-tier DDx lists — Most Likely, Expanded Differential, and Can’t Miss Diagnoses — with specific diagnostic next steps for each category.

Does Suki support multiple languages?

Yes. Suki supports 80+ languages for multilingual documentation. Glass Health currently supports English. This is a meaningful advantage for multilingual practices.

Is Suki HIPAA compliant?

Yes. Suki is HIPAA compliant with a BAA, SOC 2 Type II certification, AES-256 encryption at rest, and TLS 1.2 encryption in transit. Glass Health is also HIPAA compliant with BAA and encryption. Both platforms meet security requirements for clinical use.

Can Suki stage prescription orders from ambient conversations?

Yes. Suki is the first ambient scribe to offer ambient prescription order staging — generating and staging prescription orders directly from spoken conversation within the EHR. This is a feature Glass Health does not currently offer.

Is Glass Health free to use?

Yes. Glass Health’s Lite tier includes ambient scribing, clinical decision support, differential diagnosis generation, assessment and plan creation, and clinical Q&A at no cost. Paid plans (Starter $20/month, Pro $90/month, Max $200/month) provide additional capacity and features. Sign up here.

Bottom Line

Suki is a capable documentation and coding platform — offering broad EHR integrations, ambient order staging, ICD-10/HCC coding, 80+ language support, and expanding clinical intelligence features including UpToDate integration, AI-generated A&P content, and chart Q&A. For health systems that prioritize documentation efficiency, revenue cycle optimization, and voice-command flexibility, Suki is a well-established choice.

Suki helps you chart, bill, and increasingly access clinical reference content. Glass Health helps you think, plan, and document in a single workflow — real-time clinical insights during encounters (differential diagnosis, suggested history questions, and next steps), guideline-grounded A&P generation with evidence citations, synthesized clinical Q&A, and patient context that persists across visits. Both platforms are investing in clinical intelligence, but Glass Health’s approach is built around synthesized reasoning with citations to clinical guidelines. Glass Health starts free and costs $90/month at the Pro tier — less than a third of Suki’s estimated price — with CDS included at every level.

Start with the Glass Health free tier to compare directly, or explore all comparison pages.