Clinical Decision Support

Consult

Consult (Clinical Reference Q&A) is the platform’s default response mode. When clinicians ask a question, Glass interprets their intent, searches authoritative literature, and returns a direct, evidence‑grounded answer; consult responses include the following components:

Evidence-based

Each answer cites current research and consensus guidelines inline.

Evidence-based

Each answer cites current research and consensus guidelines inline.

Evidence-based

Each answer cites current research and consensus guidelines inline.

Organized context

Responses include related insights and guideline pearls, arranged for rapid scanning.

Organized context

Responses include related insights and guideline pearls, arranged for rapid scanning.

Organized context

Responses include related insights and guideline pearls, arranged for rapid scanning.

What is the target SpO2 range in bronchiolitis?

The target SpO2 for bronchiolitis varies between guidelines, with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommending ≥90% and UK guidelines recommending ≥92-94%.


Guideline Recommendations

  • American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2014: SpO2 ≥90% threshold for supplemental oxygen, consistent with WHO recommendations for lower respiratory tract infections.

  • UK NICE Guidelines 2015: SpO2 ≥92% threshold for supplemental oxygen.

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 2006: SpO2 ≥94% threshold.

  • Canadian Pediatric Society 2014: SpO2 ≥90% threshold.


Evidence Supporting Lower Thresholds

  • The BIDS trial demonstrated that managing infants with bronchiolitis to an SpO2 target of ≥90% was equivalent to ≥94% for cough resolution (primary outcome) and was associated with shorter hospital stays and less oxygen use.

  • Infants managed to the 90% target had faster return to adequate feeding (19.5 vs 24.1 hours) and were fit for discharge sooner (30.2 vs 44.2 hours).

  • No significant differences in serious adverse events were observed between the two oxygen saturation targets.

What is the target SpO2 range in bronchiolitis?

The target SpO2 for bronchiolitis varies between guidelines, with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommending ≥90% and UK guidelines recommending ≥92-94%.


Guideline Recommendations

  • American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2014: SpO2 ≥90% threshold for supplemental oxygen, consistent with WHO recommendations for lower respiratory tract infections.

  • UK NICE Guidelines 2015: SpO2 ≥92% threshold for supplemental oxygen.

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 2006: SpO2 ≥94% threshold.

  • Canadian Pediatric Society 2014: SpO2 ≥90% threshold.


Evidence Supporting Lower Thresholds

  • The BIDS trial demonstrated that managing infants with bronchiolitis to an SpO2 target of ≥90% was equivalent to ≥94% for cough resolution (primary outcome) and was associated with shorter hospital stays and less oxygen use.

  • Infants managed to the 90% target had faster return to adequate feeding (19.5 vs 24.1 hours) and were fit for discharge sooner (30.2 vs 44.2 hours).

  • No significant differences in serious adverse events were observed between the two oxygen saturation targets.

What is the target SpO2 range in bronchiolitis?

The target SpO2 for bronchiolitis varies between guidelines, with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommending ≥90% and UK guidelines recommending ≥92-94%.


Guideline Recommendations

  • American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2014: SpO2 ≥90% threshold for supplemental oxygen, consistent with WHO recommendations for lower respiratory tract infections.

  • UK NICE Guidelines 2015: SpO2 ≥92% threshold for supplemental oxygen.

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 2006: SpO2 ≥94% threshold.

  • Canadian Pediatric Society 2014: SpO2 ≥90% threshold.


Evidence Supporting Lower Thresholds

  • The BIDS trial demonstrated that managing infants with bronchiolitis to an SpO2 target of ≥90% was equivalent to ≥94% for cough resolution (primary outcome) and was associated with shorter hospital stays and less oxygen use.

  • Infants managed to the 90% target had faster return to adequate feeding (19.5 vs 24.1 hours) and were fit for discharge sooner (30.2 vs 44.2 hours).

  • No significant differences in serious adverse events were observed between the two oxygen saturation targets.

Differential Diagnosis

When a clinician requests a differential—or signals uncertainty—Glass drafts a structured response that begins with a succinct case discussion and concludes with next‑step recommendations; the response includes:

Differential Diagnosis

Edit

Case Discussion

This 65-year-old woman with cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes and hyperlipidemia) presents with acute-onset chest pain and diaphoresis, with ECG showing hyperacute T-waves without ST elevation. This constellation strongly suggests acute coronary syndrome (ACS), specifically non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina. Hyperacute T-waves represent a very early sign of myocardial ischemia, often preceding ST elevation, and can indicate impending complete coronary occlusion. Given her risk factors and presentation, acute myocardial infarction is highly concerning, though other cardiac and non-cardiac etiologies including aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and pericarditis must be considered.

Differential Diagnosis

Edit

Case Discussion

This 65-year-old woman with cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes and hyperlipidemia) presents with acute-onset chest pain and diaphoresis, with ECG showing hyperacute T-waves without ST elevation. This constellation strongly suggests acute coronary syndrome (ACS), specifically non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina. Hyperacute T-waves represent a very early sign of myocardial ischemia, often preceding ST elevation, and can indicate impending complete coronary occlusion. Given her risk factors and presentation, acute myocardial infarction is highly concerning, though other cardiac and non-cardiac etiologies including aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and pericarditis must be considered.

Differential Diagnosis

Edit

Case Discussion

This 65-year-old woman with cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes and hyperlipidemia) presents with acute-onset chest pain and diaphoresis, with ECG showing hyperacute T-waves without ST elevation. This constellation strongly suggests acute coronary syndrome (ACS), specifically non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina. Hyperacute T-waves represent a very early sign of myocardial ischemia, often preceding ST elevation, and can indicate impending complete coronary occlusion. Given her risk factors and presentation, acute myocardial infarction is highly concerning, though other cardiac and non-cardiac etiologies including aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and pericarditis must be considered.

Case Discussion

Summarizes key positives, negatives, and contextual factors.

Case Discussion

Summarizes key positives, negatives, and contextual factors.

Case Discussion

Summarizes key positives, negatives, and contextual factors.

Diagnostic Next Steps

  • 12-lead ECG: Obtain to evaluate for STEMI, ST-depression, T-wave inversions, or other signs of ischemia/infarction.

Dx:

  • Monitor BUN, creatinine, and electrolytes daily during diuresis

  • Urinalysis to assess for proteinuria

  • Calculate estimated GFR

Diagnostic Next Steps

  • 12-lead ECG: Obtain to evaluate for STEMI, ST-depression, T-wave inversions, or other signs of ischemia/infarction.

Dx:

  • Monitor BUN, creatinine, and electrolytes daily during diuresis

  • Urinalysis to assess for proteinuria

  • Calculate estimated GFR

Diagnostic Next Steps

  • 12-lead ECG: Obtain to evaluate for STEMI, ST-depression, T-wave inversions, or other signs of ischemia/infarction.

Dx:

  • Monitor BUN, creatinine, and electrolytes daily during diuresis

  • Urinalysis to assess for proteinuria

  • Calculate estimated GFR

Diagnostic Next Steps

Targeted labs, imaging, or monitoring to refine the list.

Diagnostic Next Steps

Targeted labs, imaging, or monitoring to refine the list.

Diagnostic Next Steps

Targeted labs, imaging, or monitoring to refine the list.

Most Likely Diagnoses

  1. Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) - STEMI or NSTEMI)

  • Supporting Evidence: Typical anginal pain radiating to the left arm, shortness of breath on exertion, multiple cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking history), tachycardia, and hypertension. The patient's history of CAD, specifically with a prior angioplasty, significantly increases the likelihood of ACS. The S4 gallop suggests…

Dx:

  • Monitor BUN, creatinine, and electrolytes daily during diuresis

  • Urinalysis to assess for proteinuria

  • Calculate estimated GFR

Most Likely Diagnoses

  1. Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) - STEMI or NSTEMI)

  • Supporting Evidence: Typical anginal pain radiating to the left arm, shortness of breath on exertion, multiple cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking history), tachycardia, and hypertension. The patient's history of CAD, specifically with a prior angioplasty, significantly increases the likelihood of ACS. The S4 gallop suggests…

Dx:

  • Monitor BUN, creatinine, and electrolytes daily during diuresis

  • Urinalysis to assess for proteinuria

  • Calculate estimated GFR

Most Likely Diagnoses

  1. Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) - STEMI or NSTEMI)

  • Supporting Evidence: Typical anginal pain radiating to the left arm, shortness of breath on exertion, multiple cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking history), tachycardia, and hypertension. The patient's history of CAD, specifically with a prior angioplasty, significantly increases the likelihood of ACS. The S4 gallop suggests…

Dx:

  • Monitor BUN, creatinine, and electrolytes daily during diuresis

  • Urinalysis to assess for proteinuria

  • Calculate estimated GFR

Categorized Differential Diagnosis

  • Most Likely — High‑probability conditions with supporting and opposing evidence.

  • Expanded Differential — Plausible alternatives warranting consideration.

  • Can’t Miss — Rare but critical diagnoses that must be excluded.

Assessment & Plan

When requested, Glass drafts an assessment & plan—ready for clinician review, revision, or incorporation into the official documentation. The output adheres to a clinical‑grade structure that combines a synthesized impression, problem‑oriented Dx / Tx bullets, actionable follow‑up items, and inline references linking every recommendation to its evidence base. The draft includes the following components:

Assessment and Plan

Edit

Clinical Impression

71-year-old male with history of myocardial infarction presenting with progressive dyspnea on exertion, bilateral lower extremity edema, S3 heart sound, and jugular venous distention. Newly discovered reduced ejection fraction of 30%, consistent with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). # Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction This patient presents with classic signs of heart failure including bilateral lower extremity edema, S3 heart sound, and JVD.

Assessment and Plan

Edit

Clinical Impression

71-year-old male with history of myocardial infarction presenting with progressive dyspnea on exertion, bilateral lower extremity edema, S3 heart sound, and jugular venous distention. Newly discovered reduced ejection fraction of 30%, consistent with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). # Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction This patient presents with classic signs of heart failure including bilateral lower extremity edema, S3 heart sound, and JVD.

Assessment and Plan

Edit

Clinical Impression

71-year-old male with history of myocardial infarction presenting with progressive dyspnea on exertion, bilateral lower extremity edema, S3 heart sound, and jugular venous distention. Newly discovered reduced ejection fraction of 30%, consistent with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). # Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction This patient presents with classic signs of heart failure including bilateral lower extremity edema, S3 heart sound, and JVD.

Clinical Impression

Concise synthesis of working diagnosis and priorities.

Clinical Impression

Concise synthesis of working diagnosis and priorities.

Clinical Impression

Concise synthesis of working diagnosis and priorities.

# Possible Renal Dysfunction

Patients with ADHF often have concomitant renal dysfunction, which may be pre-existing or acute due to cardiorenal syndrome.

Dx:

Tx:

  • Adjust medication doses based on renal function

  • Avoid nephrotic medications

  • Careful diuresis with close monitoring of renal function

# Possible Renal Dysfunction

Patients with ADHF often have concomitant renal dysfunction, which may be pre-existing or acute due to cardiorenal syndrome.

Dx:

Tx:

  • Adjust medication doses based on renal function

  • Avoid nephrotic medications

  • Careful diuresis with close monitoring of renal function

# Possible Renal Dysfunction

Patients with ADHF often have concomitant renal dysfunction, which may be pre-existing or acute due to cardiorenal syndrome.

Dx:

Tx:

  • Adjust medication doses based on renal function

  • Avoid nephrotic medications

  • Careful diuresis with close monitoring of renal function

Problem Section

  • Narrative rationale links key findings.

  • Dx — recommended diagnostics.

  • Tx — evidence‑based treatments.

# Coronary Artery Disease

  • Continue aspirin 81 mg daily

  • Continue high-intensity statin therapy

  • Regular follow-up with cardiology

  • Annual influenza vaccination

  • Pneumococcal vaccination as per guidelines

M. M. Kittleson, M. S. Maurer et al.

# Coronary Artery Disease

  • Continue aspirin 81 mg daily

  • Continue high-intensity statin therapy

  • Regular follow-up with cardiology

  • Annual influenza vaccination

  • Pneumococcal vaccination as per guidelines

M. M. Kittleson, M. S. Maurer et al.

# Coronary Artery Disease

  • Continue aspirin 81 mg daily

  • Continue high-intensity statin therapy

  • Regular follow-up with cardiology

  • Annual influenza vaccination

  • Pneumococcal vaccination as per guidelines

M. M. Kittleson, M. S. Maurer et al.

Follow‑Up Plan

Outpatient follow‑ups, education points, and referrals.

Follow‑Up Plan

Outpatient follow‑ups, education points, and referrals.

Follow‑Up Plan

Outpatient follow‑ups, education points, and referrals.

References

  1. Cardiac Amyloidosis: Evolving Diagnosis and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

M. M. Kittleson, M. S. Maurer et al.

Circulation. 2020.

Review

High Impact

Highly Cited

References

  1. Cardiac Amyloidosis: Evolving Diagnosis and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

M. M. Kittleson, M. S. Maurer et al.

Circulation. 2020.

Review

High Impact

Highly Cited

References

  1. Cardiac Amyloidosis: Evolving Diagnosis and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

M. M. Kittleson, M. S. Maurer et al.

Circulation. 2020.

Review

High Impact

Highly Cited

References

Inline numeric citations expand to a reference list.

References

Inline numeric citations expand to a reference list.

References

Inline numeric citations expand to a reference list.

Chart Summarization

Generate AI summaries of EHR data, including notes, history, medications, laboratory data, imaging data, and more.

Clinical Documentation

History & Physical Exam Note

Glass drafts a comprehensive H&P by combining EHR data with ambient dialogue. Only explicitly mentioned details are included—no inferences. If an A&P exists, it is preserved; otherwise, a new one is generated. The draft includes the following sections:

  • Chief Complaint

  • History of Present Illness

  • Past Medical & Surgical History

  • Medications

  • Allergies

  • Family History

  • Social History

  • Review of Systems

  • Vital Signs & Measurements

  • Physical Examination

  • Laboratory Data & Imaging

  • Chronic Problems

History & Physical Exam Note

Edit

History & Physical Exam Note

Chief Complaint: "Winded walking to the mailbox." History of Present Illness: 54-year-old man presents with six weeks of progressively worsening dyspnea on exertion, dry hacking cough, unintended 10-lb weight loss, low-grade fevers to 100.8°F, night sweats, and fatigue. Denies hemoptysis, chest pain, orthopnea, peripheral edema, travel, sick contacts, or toxic exposures. Past Medical History: Hyperlipidemia Surgical History: Cholecystectomy 2015 Family History: Father myocardial infarction at age 67, mother rheumatoid arthritis, no malignancies Social History: 20 pack-year smoker (quit 9 years ago), approximately 2 beers per week, no illicit drugs, accountant, lives with wife, COVID-vaccinated Medications: Atorvastatin 40 mg at bedtime, ibuprofen as needed Exam: Vitals reviewed and notable for: Temperature 99.6°F, heart rate 96, blood pressure 132/74, respiratory rate 20, oxygen saturation 93% on room air General: Thin, mildly dyspneic at rest Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat: Atraumatic, oropharynx moist, sclera anicteric Neck: Supple, no jugular venous distention or lymphadenopathy Cardiac: Regular rhythm, no murmurs, rubs, or gallops Pulmonary: Bibasilar fine "Velcro" crackles, no wheezes Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, non-distended, normoactive bowel sounds Genitourinary: No costovertebral angle tenderness, bladder non-palpable Musculoskeletal: Normal gait with full range of motion, no joint swelling Extremities: Warm, pulses 2+ bilaterally, no clubbing, cyanosis, or edema Skin: Warm, dry, intact Neurological: Alert and oriented ×3, strength 5/5 throughout, sensation intact Psychiatric: Cooperative with appropriate mood and affect

History & Physical Exam Note

Edit

History & Physical Exam Note

Chief Complaint: "Winded walking to the mailbox." History of Present Illness: 54-year-old man presents with six weeks of progressively worsening dyspnea on exertion, dry hacking cough, unintended 10-lb weight loss, low-grade fevers to 100.8°F, night sweats, and fatigue. Denies hemoptysis, chest pain, orthopnea, peripheral edema, travel, sick contacts, or toxic exposures. Past Medical History: Hyperlipidemia Surgical History: Cholecystectomy 2015 Family History: Father myocardial infarction at age 67, mother rheumatoid arthritis, no malignancies Social History: 20 pack-year smoker (quit 9 years ago), approximately 2 beers per week, no illicit drugs, accountant, lives with wife, COVID-vaccinated Medications: Atorvastatin 40 mg at bedtime, ibuprofen as needed Exam: Vitals reviewed and notable for: Temperature 99.6°F, heart rate 96, blood pressure 132/74, respiratory rate 20, oxygen saturation 93% on room air General: Thin, mildly dyspneic at rest Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat: Atraumatic, oropharynx moist, sclera anicteric Neck: Supple, no jugular venous distention or lymphadenopathy Cardiac: Regular rhythm, no murmurs, rubs, or gallops Pulmonary: Bibasilar fine "Velcro" crackles, no wheezes Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, non-distended, normoactive bowel sounds Genitourinary: No costovertebral angle tenderness, bladder non-palpable Musculoskeletal: Normal gait with full range of motion, no joint swelling Extremities: Warm, pulses 2+ bilaterally, no clubbing, cyanosis, or edema Skin: Warm, dry, intact Neurological: Alert and oriented ×3, strength 5/5 throughout, sensation intact Psychiatric: Cooperative with appropriate mood and affect

History & Physical Exam Note

Edit

History & Physical Exam Note

Chief Complaint: "Winded walking to the mailbox." History of Present Illness: 54-year-old man presents with six weeks of progressively worsening dyspnea on exertion, dry hacking cough, unintended 10-lb weight loss, low-grade fevers to 100.8°F, night sweats, and fatigue. Denies hemoptysis, chest pain, orthopnea, peripheral edema, travel, sick contacts, or toxic exposures. Past Medical History: Hyperlipidemia Surgical History: Cholecystectomy 2015 Family History: Father myocardial infarction at age 67, mother rheumatoid arthritis, no malignancies Social History: 20 pack-year smoker (quit 9 years ago), approximately 2 beers per week, no illicit drugs, accountant, lives with wife, COVID-vaccinated Medications: Atorvastatin 40 mg at bedtime, ibuprofen as needed Exam: Vitals reviewed and notable for: Temperature 99.6°F, heart rate 96, blood pressure 132/74, respiratory rate 20, oxygen saturation 93% on room air General: Thin, mildly dyspneic at rest Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat: Atraumatic, oropharynx moist, sclera anicteric Neck: Supple, no jugular venous distention or lymphadenopathy Cardiac: Regular rhythm, no murmurs, rubs, or gallops Pulmonary: Bibasilar fine "Velcro" crackles, no wheezes Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, non-distended, normoactive bowel sounds Genitourinary: No costovertebral angle tenderness, bladder non-palpable Musculoskeletal: Normal gait with full range of motion, no joint swelling Extremities: Warm, pulses 2+ bilaterally, no clubbing, cyanosis, or edema Skin: Warm, dry, intact Neurological: Alert and oriented ×3, strength 5/5 throughout, sensation intact Psychiatric: Cooperative with appropriate mood and affect

Progress Note

Edit

Progress Note

Interval Events/Subjective: Not provided Exam: Vital Signs reviewed and notable for: Afebrile, HR 88, BP 132/78, SpO₂ 94% on 2 L NC General: Alert, no acute distress Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat: Not provided Neck: Not provided Cardiac: RRR, no murmurs Pulmonary: Bibasilar fine crackles, no wheezes Abdomen: Soft, NT/ND Genitourinary: Not provided Musculoskeletal: Not provided Extremities: No edema, no clubbing Skin: No rash Neurological: A&O ×3, no focal deficits Psychiatric: Not provided Labs reviewed and notable for: ANA positive (1:160, speckled) Imaging reviewed and notable for: HRCT chest showing basilar-predominant reticulation and ground-glass opacities without discrete mass

Progress Note

Edit

Progress Note

Interval Events/Subjective: Not provided Exam: Vital Signs reviewed and notable for: Afebrile, HR 88, BP 132/78, SpO₂ 94% on 2 L NC General: Alert, no acute distress Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat: Not provided Neck: Not provided Cardiac: RRR, no murmurs Pulmonary: Bibasilar fine crackles, no wheezes Abdomen: Soft, NT/ND Genitourinary: Not provided Musculoskeletal: Not provided Extremities: No edema, no clubbing Skin: No rash Neurological: A&O ×3, no focal deficits Psychiatric: Not provided Labs reviewed and notable for: ANA positive (1:160, speckled) Imaging reviewed and notable for: HRCT chest showing basilar-predominant reticulation and ground-glass opacities without discrete mass

Progress Note

Edit

Progress Note

Interval Events/Subjective: Not provided Exam: Vital Signs reviewed and notable for: Afebrile, HR 88, BP 132/78, SpO₂ 94% on 2 L NC General: Alert, no acute distress Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat: Not provided Neck: Not provided Cardiac: RRR, no murmurs Pulmonary: Bibasilar fine crackles, no wheezes Abdomen: Soft, NT/ND Genitourinary: Not provided Musculoskeletal: Not provided Extremities: No edema, no clubbing Skin: No rash Neurological: A&O ×3, no focal deficits Psychiatric: Not provided Labs reviewed and notable for: ANA positive (1:160, speckled) Imaging reviewed and notable for: HRCT chest showing basilar-predominant reticulation and ground-glass opacities without discrete mass

Progress Note

Glass drafts a daily progress note that captures interval changes and fills gaps with a “Not provided” placeholder. The draft includes the following elements:

  • Interval Events / Subjective

  • Objective

    • Vital signs & nursing data

    • Focused physical exam

    • Laboratory results

    • Imaging & procedures

  • Assessment & Plan — Updated or newly drafted as needed.

Discharge Summary

Glass drafts a structured discharge summary that encapsulates the hospitalization and supports a safe transition. The draft includes the following sections:

  • Header Information — Admission and discharge dates.

  • Final Diagnoses — Primary and secondary.

  • Hospital Course

  • Exam on Discharge

  • Significant Labs / Imaging

  • Operations / Procedures

  • Consultations

  • Discharge Medications

  • Required Outpatient Follow‑Up

  • Disposition

  • Embedded A&P

Patient‑Facing Documentation

Discharge Instructions

Glass drafts plain‑language instructions summarizing the stay and outlining next steps. The instructions include the following components:

Evidence‑grounded

  • Hospital Summary Paragraph

  • Medication Changes — Begin, continue, stop.

  • Follow‑Up

  • Warning Signs

  • Reassuring Closing

Discharge Instructions

Edit

Discharge Instructions

Dear Patient, You were admitted to the hospital with breathing problems and concern for lung disease. While in the hospital, you had CT scans and breathing tests that showed scarring in your lungs (fibrotic interstitial lung disease). A bronchoscopy procedure was done to look for infection or cancer, which came back negative. Your breathing improved with oxygen therapy and learning about pulmonary rehabilitation. On Discharge: BEGIN: Use oxygen 1-2 liters as needed with activity and exertion Continue your home medications as prescribed STOP: No medications were stopped during this admission Continue taking your other medications as before. Follow Up With: ILD (Interstitial Lung Disease) clinic as scheduled Rheumatology clinic as scheduled Outpatient lung biopsy (cryobiopsy) as scheduled Please call your doctor, call 911, or return to the emergency department if you have worsening shortness of breath, chest pain, fever, or any other concerning symptoms. It was a pleasure taking care of you.

Discharge Instructions

Edit

Discharge Instructions

Dear Patient, You were admitted to the hospital with breathing problems and concern for lung disease. While in the hospital, you had CT scans and breathing tests that showed scarring in your lungs (fibrotic interstitial lung disease). A bronchoscopy procedure was done to look for infection or cancer, which came back negative. Your breathing improved with oxygen therapy and learning about pulmonary rehabilitation. On Discharge: BEGIN: Use oxygen 1-2 liters as needed with activity and exertion Continue your home medications as prescribed STOP: No medications were stopped during this admission Continue taking your other medications as before. Follow Up With: ILD (Interstitial Lung Disease) clinic as scheduled Rheumatology clinic as scheduled Outpatient lung biopsy (cryobiopsy) as scheduled Please call your doctor, call 911, or return to the emergency department if you have worsening shortness of breath, chest pain, fever, or any other concerning symptoms. It was a pleasure taking care of you.

Discharge Instructions

Edit

Discharge Instructions

Dear Patient, You were admitted to the hospital with breathing problems and concern for lung disease. While in the hospital, you had CT scans and breathing tests that showed scarring in your lungs (fibrotic interstitial lung disease). A bronchoscopy procedure was done to look for infection or cancer, which came back negative. Your breathing improved with oxygen therapy and learning about pulmonary rehabilitation. On Discharge: BEGIN: Use oxygen 1-2 liters as needed with activity and exertion Continue your home medications as prescribed STOP: No medications were stopped during this admission Continue taking your other medications as before. Follow Up With: ILD (Interstitial Lung Disease) clinic as scheduled Rheumatology clinic as scheduled Outpatient lung biopsy (cryobiopsy) as scheduled Please call your doctor, call 911, or return to the emergency department if you have worsening shortness of breath, chest pain, fever, or any other concerning symptoms. It was a pleasure taking care of you.

Patient Handout

Edit

Patient Handout

Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease What Is It? Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a group of conditions that cause inflammation and scarring (fibrosis) in the lung tissue between the air sacs. This scarring makes it harder for oxygen to pass from your lungs into your bloodstream, leading to breathing difficulties. In the US, ILD affects approximately 650,000 people and causes approximately 25,000 to 30,000 deaths per year. Common Signs/Symptoms The most common symptom is shortness of breath during activity (dyspnea on exertion). Approximately 30% of patients with ILD report a dry cough. Other symptoms may include fatigue, unintended weight loss, and reduced ability to exercise. As the disease progresses, you may experience breathlessness even at rest. Causes or Risk Factors Some forms of ILD are associated with environmental or occupational exposures, certain medications, or connective tissue disorders like rheumatoid arthritis or scleroderma. However, many cases have no known cause and are called "idiopathic." Risk factors include older age, with IPF being more common in men than women, and smoking history. Possible Complications A 5% decline in lung function (forced vital capacity) over 12 months is associated with approximately a 2-fold increase in mortality compared with no change. Up to 85% of individuals with end-stage fibrotic ILD develop pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the lungs). Some patients may experience acute worsening episodes that can be life-threatening

Patient Handout

Edit

Patient Handout

Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease What Is It? Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a group of conditions that cause inflammation and scarring (fibrosis) in the lung tissue between the air sacs. This scarring makes it harder for oxygen to pass from your lungs into your bloodstream, leading to breathing difficulties. In the US, ILD affects approximately 650,000 people and causes approximately 25,000 to 30,000 deaths per year. Common Signs/Symptoms The most common symptom is shortness of breath during activity (dyspnea on exertion). Approximately 30% of patients with ILD report a dry cough. Other symptoms may include fatigue, unintended weight loss, and reduced ability to exercise. As the disease progresses, you may experience breathlessness even at rest. Causes or Risk Factors Some forms of ILD are associated with environmental or occupational exposures, certain medications, or connective tissue disorders like rheumatoid arthritis or scleroderma. However, many cases have no known cause and are called "idiopathic." Risk factors include older age, with IPF being more common in men than women, and smoking history. Possible Complications A 5% decline in lung function (forced vital capacity) over 12 months is associated with approximately a 2-fold increase in mortality compared with no change. Up to 85% of individuals with end-stage fibrotic ILD develop pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the lungs). Some patients may experience acute worsening episodes that can be life-threatening

Patient Handout

Edit

Patient Handout

Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease What Is It? Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a group of conditions that cause inflammation and scarring (fibrosis) in the lung tissue between the air sacs. This scarring makes it harder for oxygen to pass from your lungs into your bloodstream, leading to breathing difficulties. In the US, ILD affects approximately 650,000 people and causes approximately 25,000 to 30,000 deaths per year. Common Signs/Symptoms The most common symptom is shortness of breath during activity (dyspnea on exertion). Approximately 30% of patients with ILD report a dry cough. Other symptoms may include fatigue, unintended weight loss, and reduced ability to exercise. As the disease progresses, you may experience breathlessness even at rest. Causes or Risk Factors Some forms of ILD are associated with environmental or occupational exposures, certain medications, or connective tissue disorders like rheumatoid arthritis or scleroderma. However, many cases have no known cause and are called "idiopathic." Risk factors include older age, with IPF being more common in men than women, and smoking history. Possible Complications A 5% decline in lung function (forced vital capacity) over 12 months is associated with approximately a 2-fold increase in mortality compared with no change. Up to 85% of individuals with end-stage fibrotic ILD develop pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the lungs). Some patients may experience acute worsening episodes that can be life-threatening

Patient Handout

Glass drafts condition‑specific handouts that explain diagnoses and self‑care in accessible language. The handout includes the following sections:

  • Condition Overview

  • Signs / Symptoms

  • Causes / Risk Factors

  • Complications

  • Treatment Options

  • When to Seek Help

  • Additional Advice / Follow-Up

  • Disclaimer

Advanced Functionality

Workspace

A unified dashboard for viewing, organizing, and editing all files generated during an encounter; the Workspace offers the following capabilities:

  • File Tabs — Browse and switch between generated files within a tabbed interface

  • Inline Editing — Make real‑time changes with tracked modifications.

  • Version History — Review, compare, and restore prior versions.

DDX

A&P

H&P

More…

Edit

Case Discussion


This 65-year-old woman with diabetes and hyperlipidemia presents with acute chest pain, diaphoresis, and hyperacute T-waves without ST elevation - a constellation highly concerning for acute coronary syndrome. Hyperacute T-waves represent the earliest ECG manifestation of acute coronary occlusion and often precede ST elevation, making this presentation equivalent to STEMI despite the absence of frank ST elevation. Women with diabetes are at particularly high risk for atypical presentations of ACS and may have delayed recognition of symptoms. The combination of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, hyperlipidemia, age >65) with acute symptoms and hyperacute T-waves creates a very high pretest probability for acute myocardial infarction requiring emergent intervention.


Most Likely Diagnoses


  1. Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI equivalent): Hyperacute T-waves represent the earliest ECG sign of acute coronary occlusion and often precede frank ST elevation. This patient's presentation with acute chest pain, diaphoresis, and hyperacute T-waves warrants immediate reperfusion therapy despite absence of ST elevation.


  1. Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI): Women with diabetes commonly present with acute coronary syndromes and may have non-specific symptoms leading to diagnostic delays. The hyperacute T-waves suggest significant coronary ischemia that may represent NSTEMI with impending progression to STEMI.


Expanded Differential


  1. Wellens Syndrome (LAD Stenosis): Hyperacute T-waves can evolve into the characteristic biphasic or deeply inverted T-waves of Wellens syndrome, indicating critical proximal LAD stenosis. This represents a pre-infarction state requiring urgent intervention to prevent extensive anterior wall MI.


  1. Posterior Wall STEMI: ST depression in anterior leads with hyperacute changes may represent posterior wall STEMI, particularly involving the left circumflex artery. Posterior leads (V7-V9) would be needed to confirm this diagnosis.

DDX

A&P

H&P

More…

Edit

Case Discussion


This 65-year-old woman with diabetes and hyperlipidemia presents with acute chest pain, diaphoresis, and hyperacute T-waves without ST elevation - a constellation highly concerning for acute coronary syndrome. Hyperacute T-waves represent the earliest ECG manifestation of acute coronary occlusion and often precede ST elevation, making this presentation equivalent to STEMI despite the absence of frank ST elevation. Women with diabetes are at particularly high risk for atypical presentations of ACS and may have delayed recognition of symptoms. The combination of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, hyperlipidemia, age >65) with acute symptoms and hyperacute T-waves creates a very high pretest probability for acute myocardial infarction requiring emergent intervention.


Most Likely Diagnoses


  1. Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI equivalent): Hyperacute T-waves represent the earliest ECG sign of acute coronary occlusion and often precede frank ST elevation. This patient's presentation with acute chest pain, diaphoresis, and hyperacute T-waves warrants immediate reperfusion therapy despite absence of ST elevation.


  1. Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI): Women with diabetes commonly present with acute coronary syndromes and may have non-specific symptoms leading to diagnostic delays. The hyperacute T-waves suggest significant coronary ischemia that may represent NSTEMI with impending progression to STEMI.


Expanded Differential


  1. Wellens Syndrome (LAD Stenosis): Hyperacute T-waves can evolve into the characteristic biphasic or deeply inverted T-waves of Wellens syndrome, indicating critical proximal LAD stenosis. This represents a pre-infarction state requiring urgent intervention to prevent extensive anterior wall MI.


  1. Posterior Wall STEMI: ST depression in anterior leads with hyperacute changes may represent posterior wall STEMI, particularly involving the left circumflex artery. Posterior leads (V7-V9) would be needed to confirm this diagnosis.

DDX

A&P

H&P

More…

Edit

Case Discussion


This 65-year-old woman with diabetes and hyperlipidemia presents with acute chest pain, diaphoresis, and hyperacute T-waves without ST elevation - a constellation highly concerning for acute coronary syndrome. Hyperacute T-waves represent the earliest ECG manifestation of acute coronary occlusion and often precede ST elevation, making this presentation equivalent to STEMI despite the absence of frank ST elevation. Women with diabetes are at particularly high risk for atypical presentations of ACS and may have delayed recognition of symptoms. The combination of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, hyperlipidemia, age >65) with acute symptoms and hyperacute T-waves creates a very high pretest probability for acute myocardial infarction requiring emergent intervention.


Most Likely Diagnoses


  1. Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI equivalent): Hyperacute T-waves represent the earliest ECG sign of acute coronary occlusion and often precede frank ST elevation. This patient's presentation with acute chest pain, diaphoresis, and hyperacute T-waves warrants immediate reperfusion therapy despite absence of ST elevation.


  1. Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI): Women with diabetes commonly present with acute coronary syndromes and may have non-specific symptoms leading to diagnostic delays. The hyperacute T-waves suggest significant coronary ischemia that may represent NSTEMI with impending progression to STEMI.


Expanded Differential


  1. Wellens Syndrome (LAD Stenosis): Hyperacute T-waves can evolve into the characteristic biphasic or deeply inverted T-waves of Wellens syndrome, indicating critical proximal LAD stenosis. This represents a pre-infarction state requiring urgent intervention to prevent extensive anterior wall MI.


  1. Posterior Wall STEMI: ST depression in anterior leads with hyperacute changes may represent posterior wall STEMI, particularly involving the left circumflex artery. Posterior leads (V7-V9) would be needed to confirm this diagnosis.

Deep Reasoning

Deep Reasoning allocates the maximum reasoning effort and time available within Glass when answering complex or high‑stakes questions. Although this introduces additional latency, it yields deeper evidence synthesis, stronger clinical reasoning, and more nuanced recommendations. It is best reserved for difficult or ambiguous cases where a standard consult may be insufficient.

Standard
Reasoning

Ambient CDS

Glass goes beyond scribing — our Ambient CDS serves as an intelligent clinical assistant during your patient encounter. It listens and provides diagnostic insights while you're with your patient, and then generates comprehensive documentation in seconds afterward.

Clinical Insights During Your Encounter

As the patient-provider encounter unfolds, Glass provides intelligent support in real time:

Evolving differential diagnoses

that refine as the history unfolds

Suggested history questions

to gather critical information

Physical exam recommendations

to complete before leaving the room

Preliminary next steps

to review and discuss with your patient in the moment

Documentation That Adapts to You

Transform any patient encounter into the exact documentation you need—clinic notes, H&P notes, progress notes, discharge summaries, or patient handouts. Upload your own templates and preferences to ensure every note matches your style. Edit directly or with AI assistance, with all recommendations backed by the latest medical evidence.

contact@glass.health

Product

2025 Glass Health. All rights reserved.

contact@glass.health

Product

2025 Glass Health. All rights reserved.

contact@glass.health

Product

2025 Glass Health. All rights reserved.